UDO Text Amendment on Development Moratoria

Expressed support for the UDO text amendment and urged the county to pass a strong data center moratorium matching the city's 12-month ban.

Supported passing the text amendment as a crucial first step to protect public water and natural resources from data center impacts.

Spoke in favor of the amendment, noting it aligns with sustainable infrastructure goals and allows proper research on issues like data centers.

Questioned the impact of data centers on local water supplies and energy bills, urging the county to use the text amendment to enact strong moratorium protections.

Supported the amendment as a culture of care that gives leaders time to properly evaluate community needs over corporate profits.

Backed the UDO change to allow more research on downstream effects and urged matching or exceeding city moratorium timelines.

Expressed support for the text amendment as a tool to protect resident health and futures against rapid industrial development.

Supported the amendment and called for a fairer approach to taxing data centers alongside residential taxpayers.

Supported the text amendment to stop harmful developments and criticized corporate tax incentives.

Spoke on behalf of Sunrise Movement supporting local authority to pass longer moratoria on environmentally harmful projects like data centers.

Urged passing the amendment to allow time to pause and plan against rapid technological threats like hyperscale data centers.

Supported the UDO amendment to help enact strong moratoria and protect local water and soil from data center and industrial contamination.

Praised county legal staff for identifying the UDO restriction and supported a moratorium to evaluate data center energy and water impacts.